Mecklenburg County
ADU Pass helps homeowners in Mecklenburg County, Virginia navigate the permit paperwork for building an accessory dwelling unit. We cover 11 cities and 14 ZIP codes in this county.
Map
County ADU details
County ADU ordinance
Mecklenburg County regulates accessory dwelling units through its county Zoning Ordinance, administered by the Mecklenburg County Planning and Community Development Department (Planning & Zoning Office) under the authority of the Mecklenburg County Board of Supervisors. Virginia is a Dillon Rule state and the General Assembly has not enacted any statewide ADU preemption; the county's authority to regulate, restrict, or prohibit ADUs derives solely from the general zoning enabling statute at Va. Code § 15.2-2280 and the ordinance-content provisions of § 15.2-2286. Mecklenburg County is a Southside Virginia county on the North Carolina border (county seat Boydton, population approximately 30,000) whose southern half is dominated by the John H. Kerr Reservoir (Buggs Island Lake), a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers flood-control and hydroelectric project. The county ordinance establishes use districts typical of rural-Virginia counties (Agricultural A-1 and A-2, Residential R-1 and R-2, Business B-1 and B-2, Industrial M-1 and M-2, Planned Unit Development, and lake-area / resort residential districts reflecting the heavy shoreline vacation-home character). A second dwelling on a single residential parcel is not a by-right permitted use in standard residential districts; ADU-style projects typically proceed either (a) through the county's family-dwelling / family-subdivision provisions (limited to conveyances or dwellings for immediate family members), (b) through a discretionary Special Use Permit approved by the Board of Supervisors following Planning Commission recommendation, or (c) by recording a family or minor subdivision to place the second dwelling on its own lot. Mecklenburg County has not adopted a standalone ministerial ADU ordinance of the California / Oregon / Washington type; the practical effect is that a homeowner cannot rely on an 'ADU by-right' framework, and each ADU-style project is subject to district-specific analysis and, in the common case of non-family rental occupancy, a discretionary Special Use Permit process. The county contains five incorporated towns — Boydton, Chase City, Clarksville, La Crosse, and South Hill — each of which administers its own zoning and building permits for parcels within town corporate limits; county zoning does not govern inside any of the towns. Note also that Mecklenburg County, Virginia is distinct from the much larger Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Charlotte metro area); the two share no administration and no ordinance text in common.
Code citations:
- Mecklenburg County, Virginia — County Code and Zoning Ordinance
- Mecklenburg County Planning and Community Development Department (Planning & Zoning)
- Mecklenburg County Board of Supervisors — adopting body for zoning ordinance amendments and Special Use Permits
- Mecklenburg County Planning Commission
- Virginia Code Title 15.2 Chapter 22 (Planning, Subdivision of Land and Zoning)
State-floor overlay: Virginia has not enacted any statewide ADU preemption statute. Virginia is a Dillon Rule state (see Commonwealth v. County Bd. of Arlington County, 217 Va. 558 (1977)); localities have only those powers expressly granted by the General Assembly. The general zoning enabling statute at Va. Code § 15.2-2280 grants counties, cities, and towns broad authority to regulate land use, and § 15.2-2286 enumerates the specific ordinance provisions that may be included. Neither statute, nor any section of Title 15.2 Chapter 22 Article 7, mandates that a locality permit ADUs, requires ministerial review of ADU applications, caps parking requirements, caps fees, or voids owner-occupancy requirements. Mecklenburg County is therefore free to permit, restrict, or prohibit second dwellings under its zoning ordinance within the ordinary constitutional limits on land-use regulation. ADU preemption bills have been introduced in the Virginia General Assembly in multiple recent sessions (2022-2025) without enactment; the statewide regulatory picture at the county level is unchanged.
Adopting body: Mecklenburg County Board of Supervisors
County permitting (unincorporated parcels)
The Mecklenburg County Planning and Community Development Department (Planning, Zoning, and Building Inspections) is the sole permitting authority for building permits, zoning permits, and Special Use Permits on parcels within the unincorporated county (i.e., parcels outside the corporate limits of the Towns of Boydton, Chase City, Clarksville, La Crosse, and South Hill). Mecklenburg County comprises approximately 676 square miles of Southside Virginia Piedmont, of which approximately 50,000 acres are covered by the John H. Kerr Reservoir (Buggs Island Lake), the largest man-made lake wholly or partly within Virginia. The county's five incorporated towns administer their own zoning and building permits; all other populated places (Baskerville, Bracey, Buffalo Junction, Nelson, Skipwith, Virgilina, and numerous smaller unincorporated communities) are administered by the county. For an ADU-style project in the unincorporated county, the typical sequence is: (a) zoning determination by the zoning administrator (permitted by right under a narrow family/kinship reading, permitted via Special Use Permit, or prohibited); (b) if SUP required, application to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors under Va. Code §§ 15.2-2204, 15.2-2285, 15.2-2286; (c) building permit application to the county building official; (d) inspections through construction; (e) certificate of occupancy. Applicants on parcels within the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Kerr Reservoir shoreline easement must additionally coordinate with the Corps (Wilmington District) before any lake-adjacent construction; see the countyOverlays section. Applicants should expect a substantially longer timeline than a first-dwelling build when an SUP is required, because the SUP process is a public-hearing process with statutory notice requirements (two successive weeks' advertisement and five-day final notice under Va. Code § 15.2-2204).
Process overview: Mecklenburg County's ADU-style permitting process varies by project pathway: (1) Family dwelling / family subdivision — if the second dwelling is for an immediate family member of the primary-dwelling owner and qualifies under the county's family-dwelling or family-subdivision provisions, the zoning administrator may issue an administrative zoning approval followed by a standard building permit; this is the fastest path when eligible, typically 4-8 weeks end-to-end assuming no building-code complications. (2) Special Use Permit for a rental or non-family second dwelling — the applicant submits a completed SUP application with site plan, statement of use, and the required filing fee to the Planning and Community Development Department. Staff conducts a zoning analysis and prepares a staff report. The Planning Commission holds a public hearing (advertised per Va. Code § 15.2-2204: once a week for two successive weeks, with final notice not less than five days before the hearing) and makes a recommendation. The Board of Supervisors then holds its own public hearing and votes. The entire SUP process typically takes 60-120 days from complete submission to Board decision; complex applications or those requiring ordinance interpretation can take longer, and lake-adjacent applications that require Army Corps coordination can take materially longer. (3) Minor subdivision — if the applicant prefers to create a separate buildable lot and construct a fully separate dwelling, the subdivision ordinance (separate chapter of the county code) applies. Subdivision review runs through the subdivision agent and the Planning Commission; timelines vary from approximately 30 days (simple minor subdivision) to 6+ months (major subdivision requiring road approval, stormwater, and VDOT entrance approval). Building permits for a second dwelling require compliance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code (USBC), which is the single statewide building code for Virginia localities; localities cannot adopt more stringent building-code amendments (Va. Code § 36-98). Well and septic approval (for unincorporated parcels not served by public utilities) is administered by the Virginia Department of Health Southside Health District (local office serving Mecklenburg County) and is required before a building permit can be issued for a dwelling not connected to public water/sewer. Entrance-permit approval by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Lynchburg District may be required where the new dwelling uses a new or altered driveway onto a state-maintained road. For parcels inside the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Kerr Reservoir project boundary or bound by the Corps' shoreline easement, Corps approval must be obtained before any shoreline work.
Impact fees: Virginia localities generally do not levy impact fees of the type used in California or Florida; Virginia Code does not broadly authorize impact fees for counties outside certain narrowly enumerated categories (road impact fees under Va. Code § 15.2-2317 through § 15.2-2327 are available only to counties meeting specific growth-rate and density criteria). Mecklenburg County does not appear on the list of counties that have adopted a road-impact-fee ordinance under that authority as of 2026-04-21. Cash proffers tied to rezoning applications were formerly common but are now constrained by Va. Code § 15.2-2303.4 (2016) which limits residential proffers. For an ADU built on an existing parcel without rezoning, the applicant pays building-permit fees (set by the county by ordinance and keyed to project valuation), any SUP application fee if applicable, connection or tap fees for water/sewer (if served by a public utility — generally only within town limits or the limited county service areas), and state and local permit surcharges. Applicants should request a current fee schedule from the Planning and Community Development Department at application time. (schedule)
County assessor
Mecklenburg County real property is assessed by the Mecklenburg County Real Estate Assessor's Office (commonly administered in coordination with the Commissioner of the Revenue); tax administration and personal-property taxation are handled by the Mecklenburg County Commissioner of the Revenue, and tax bills are collected by the Mecklenburg County Treasurer. Virginia law requires general reassessment of real property at least once every four years for most counties (Va. Code § 58.1-3252), with more frequent cycles permitted; Mecklenburg County historically conducts a general reassessment on a multi-year cycle set by the Board of Supervisors and contracted to a mass-appraisal firm. Unlike California's Proposition 13 acquisition-value system, Virginia uses a fair-market-value assessment system: a parcel is assessed at 100% of fair market value as of the effective date of the reassessment, and that value stands until the next general reassessment (subject to supplemental assessment for new construction). When an ADU / accessory dwelling is added to an existing parcel, the new structure is added to the assessment roll at its contributory fair market value; the primary dwelling's assessed value is not automatically re-triggered by the ADU construction itself, but the parcel's overall assessed value rises by the ADU's contributory value. Lake-frontage parcels on Kerr Reservoir command materially higher fair-market-value assessments than comparable inland parcels and reassessment cycles typically re-stamp lake-adjacent value uplift; owners adding ADUs on lake frontage should expect the new structure to be valued at the higher shoreline contributory rate. At the next general reassessment, both structures are re-valued at current fair market value together. The property-tax bill equals assessed value times the Board of Supervisors' adopted real-estate tax rate (set annually in the county budget process).
Assessment policy: Virginia is a fair-market-value assessment state; a new ADU is added to the assessment roll at its contributory fair market value as a supplemental assessment effective from completion (building permit final inspection or certificate of occupancy) through the balance of the tax year. The primary dwelling's prior assessed value is not automatically reset by the addition of the ADU, but the parcel's total assessed value increases by the ADU's contributory value. At the next general reassessment (Mecklenburg County operates on a multi-year reassessment cycle set by the Board of Supervisors), both the primary dwelling and the ADU are re-valued at current fair market value. Owners electing to convert existing interior space (e.g., a basement apartment) to a permitted ADU should expect the contributory value to reflect the creation of a second kitchen and second entry and the resulting increase in market-rent potential of the parcel; an owner adding a detached ADU typically sees a larger incremental assessment increase than one converting existing interior space. Owners of Kerr Reservoir waterfront parcels should expect a significantly higher per-square-foot contributory value on new ADU construction than comparable inland parcels, reflecting the waterfront rental / second-home market. Property-tax rates are set annually by the Mecklenburg County Board of Supervisors in the county budget process; owners should confirm the current year's rate from the county's adopted budget because rates change annually.
County overlays (5)
Mecklenburg County administers or is subject to several overlay regimes that affect ADU siting on unincorporated parcels: (1) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers John H. Kerr Reservoir shoreline management — the Kerr Reservoir (Buggs Island Lake), impounded by the John H. Kerr Dam on the Roanoke River near the Virginia-North Carolina border, is a federal flood-control and hydroelectric project operated by the USACE Wilmington District. The Corps holds fee title or flowage easements to land within the project boundary up to the flood-pool elevation, and the Corps' Kerr Reservoir Shoreline Management Plan governs any structure, dock, pier, clearing, or ADU-adjacent activity within the project boundary. This is the single most important county-level overlay because a substantial fraction of Mecklenburg County residential land abuts the reservoir; (2) FEMA Special Flood Hazard Areas along the Roanoke River and its tributaries (Allen Creek, Bluestone Creek, Butchers Creek, Island Creek, and others), administered through the county's floodplain ordinance satisfying NFIP minimums; (3) Agricultural and Forestal Districts established under Va. Code § 15.2-4300 et seq., providing participating landowners use-value taxation and subdivision-deferral protections in exchange for a commitment to keep land in agricultural or forestal use; (4) the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act does NOT apply — Mecklenburg County is not in the Tidewater area covered by Va. Code § 62.1-44.15:67 et seq., so Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) and Resource Management Areas (RMAs) do not apply; (5) Virginia does not impose a California-style Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone regulatory overlay mandating ignition-resistant construction — the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code does not statewide-adopt the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code; (6) Mecklenburg County does not have a county-wide historic-district overlay, though individual properties may be listed on the Virginia Landmarks Register or National Register (for example, the Prestwould Plantation near Clarksville and various Boydton historic structures associated with Randolph-Macon College's original Boydton campus) — Register listing does not itself impose regulatory constraints on private rehabilitation absent a separate local ordinance or federal-tax-credit election. The towns of Boydton, Chase City, Clarksville, La Crosse, and South Hill administer any local historic overlays within their own corporate limits, not the county.
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — John H. Kerr Reservoir Shoreline Management Plan — The John H. Kerr Reservoir (Buggs Island Lake) is a federal flood-control and hydroelectric project on the Roanoke River impounded by the John H. Kerr Dam, completed in 1952. The reservoir extends across Mecklenburg, Charlotte, and Halifax Counties in Virginia and Warren, Vance, and Granville Counties in North Carolina, with a summer pool surface area of approximately 50,000 acres. The USACE Wilmington District operates the project and administers the shoreline management plan. The Corps holds fee title or flowage easements within the project boundary (generally up to approximately the 320-foot elevation flood pool; the project boundary is a surveyed line on record with the Corps). Within the project boundary, any structure (dock, pier, boat ramp, bulkhead, clearing, shoreline stabilization), vegetation modification, or land disturbance requires a Corps permit or lease. Private dwellings (including ADUs) cannot be placed within the project boundary at all under current Corps policy; an ADU on a parcel with lake frontage must be sited upland of the project boundary. The Corps also restricts certain incompatible uses (commercial marinas without lease, vegetation removal without permit, etc.). Parcels that abut the reservoir but whose fee ownership extends only to the project boundary have limited shoreline-use rights — holders of adjacent-owner permits may install docks consistent with the Corps' slot-allocation and dock-design standards, but the underlying land is federal and not available for dwelling siting. Owners and buyers of lake-adjacent parcels should request a current project-boundary verification from the Corps before any site planning; the boundary is not always obvious on the ground and several title disputes in the reservoir's history have been resolved in favor of the Corps' surveyed line. The shoreline management plan is periodically updated; the current plan's density and use allocations should be confirmed with the Kerr Reservoir project office at the start of any ADU project.
- FEMA National Flood Insurance Program — Special Flood Hazard Areas — Mecklenburg County participates in the National Flood Insurance Program and administers a county floodplain ordinance meeting NFIP minimums. The principal Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) extents in the county are along the Roanoke River upstream of Kerr Reservoir, the reservoir shoreline itself (which intersects the NFIP-mapped flood pool), and the larger tributaries feeding the reservoir including Allen Creek, Bluestone Creek, Butchers Creek, Island Creek, and Hyco Creek. The interplay of NFIP floodplain mapping and the Corps' project boundary can be complex near the reservoir: the project boundary is a federally-surveyed line tied to flood-pool elevation, while the NFIP SFHA is a FEMA-mapped flood hazard area that may extend outside the project boundary in backwater inlets. An ADU sited in an SFHA but outside the Corps project boundary must comply with NFIP elevation requirements (lowest finished floor at or above Base Flood Elevation plus any county freeboard), flood vent requirements on enclosed areas below BFE, anchoring requirements, and post-construction Elevation Certificate filing. Owners should confirm current-effective FIRM panel at the FEMA Map Service Center before design; FEMA has periodically updated Virginia county panels.
- Virginia Agricultural and Forestal Districts (local option under state law) — Mecklenburg County has established Agricultural and Forestal Districts under the state AFD Act. Enrollment is voluntary; participating landowners commit to keeping land in agricultural or forestal use for a period (typically 4-10 years) in exchange for use-value assessment (Va. Code § 58.1-3230 et seq.) and limited protection from certain governmental actions that would disrupt agricultural use. The county's historically tobacco-dominated agricultural economy means AFD enrollment is a meaningful feature of the rural-land fabric. An ADU on an AFD-enrolled parcel is generally permitted if it is an accessory use to continued agricultural operation (e.g., a farm-labor dwelling or family dwelling), but non-agricultural commercial-rental ADUs may conflict with AFD purposes and trigger AFD committee review. Owners should consult the Mecklenburg County AFD Advisory Committee and the zoning administrator before assuming ADU compatibility.
- Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and VDOF wildfire risk (no WUI regulatory overlay) — Mecklenburg County has moderate forested-parcel wildfire exposure tracked by the Virginia Department of Forestry, but Virginia does not have a statewide Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone regulatory overlay that mandates WUI-rated construction materials on a per-parcel basis. Under Va. Code § 36-98 the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code is the single statewide building code; localities cannot impose more stringent local building-code amendments. Virginia has not statewide-adopted the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code. Owners in forested or wildfire-exposed locations should follow defensible-space best practices but face no locality-imposed WUI construction overlay analogous to California Chapter 7A or Oregon WUI code.
- Historic / National Register parcels (notification only; no overlay) — Mecklenburg County contains several properties individually listed on the Virginia Landmarks Register and the National Register of Historic Places, including Prestwould Plantation near Clarksville and historic structures in Boydton associated with the original Boydton campus of Randolph-Macon College. Listing on either register does not by itself impose regulatory constraints on private rehabilitation — the registers are primarily notification and incentive programs. Owners electing to use federal or state Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits must follow the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation for the subject property, but an owner not claiming tax credits is not subject to design review under the registers alone. Mecklenburg County has not adopted a county-wide local historic overlay; individual towns (Boydton, Chase City, Clarksville, La Crosse, South Hill) may administer their own local historic districts within corporate limits, governed by their respective town ordinances. Owners considering an ADU addition to or adjacent to a Register-listed structure should consult the Virginia Department of Historic Resources for design guidance if claiming tax credits.
Known county issues (5)
- policy-review — Homeowners cannot rely on a ministerial ADU-by-right approval path; most rental-ADU projects will require a discretionary Special Use Permit (60-120 day public-hearing process) or a minor subdivision. This adds materially to project timeline, uncertainty, and soft costs relative to states with statewide ADU preemption. It also means rental-ADU economics in the unincorporated county depend on securing discretionary Board approval; a denial is a project-killing outcome with no administrative remedy short of a substantially revised application.
- other — Lake-frontage ADU projects must verify the Corps project boundary before site design; an ADU cannot be sited within the project boundary, and any shoreline improvement (including a dock, pier, or bulkhead serving the ADU's occupants) requires a Corps permit that is independent of county approval. A substantial share of the Mecklenburg County ADU market — the vacation-home / short-term-rental segment on Kerr Reservoir frontage — is therefore gated by a federal permit overlay that county staff do not control and that has its own review timelines. Projects that fail to coordinate with the Corps at the feasibility stage routinely require redesign.
- other — Applicants in and near Boydton, Chase City, Clarksville, La Crosse, and South Hill must verify whether their parcel is inside a town corporate boundary (town ordinance governs) or outside (county ordinance governs). A mistaken assumption can route an applicant to the wrong permit counter and cause weeks of rework. For homeowners whose address postally reads as one of these towns but whose parcel is actually in the unincorporated county, the county Planning and Community Development office in Boydton is the correct permitting authority.
- other — Unincorporated-parcel ADU projects must budget for Virginia Department of Health well/septic evaluation and, frequently, for drainfield expansion or a dedicated secondary system — commonly adding $10,000-$30,000+ to project cost and potentially ruling out small or constrained lots where soil/slope fail percolation or reserve-drainfield requirements. Lake-frontage parcels face the most acute constraint because mandatory setbacks from Kerr Reservoir and from wells can leave very little of the parcel usable for a drainfield.
- other — ADU projects that would require a new driveway entrance onto a state-maintained secondary road must obtain a VDOT entrance permit before the building permit issues; sight-distance and entrance-spacing requirements can drive ADU site selection and occasionally make a project infeasible at the originally-preferred location. Shared driveways using the existing entrance typically avoid this requirement.
Virginia state — ADU law and programs
State ADU law
Virginia has NOT enacted a statewide ADU preemption law. Virginia is a Dillon Rule state — localities possess only those powers expressly granted by the General Assembly — and the statutes granting zoning authority (Va. Code § 15.2-2280 et seq.) leave ADU regulation to local ordinances. ADU permission, setbacks, parking, size, and owner-occupancy rules therefore vary by county, independent city, and town. Virginia is unique in that it has 38 independent cities that function as counties (neither in nor subordinate to the surrounding county), meaning 'the county' for any given Virginia property may be an independent city rather than a true county. Several ADU preemption bills have been introduced in recent General Assembly sessions (2022 through 2025) without enactment; none have advanced past committee as of the Assembly's 2026 regular session adjournment.
State financing programs
Virginia does not operate an ADU-specific statewide loan, grant, or forgivable-loan program. Virginia Housing (formerly the Virginia Housing Development Authority, VHDA — rebranded 2020) administers general first-time-homebuyer, down-payment-assistance (DPA), mortgage-credit-certificate, and rehabilitation products that can be applied to ADU-adjacent purchases or improvements when eligibility criteria are met, but none target ADU construction as a distinct product. The Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) administers federal HOME and CDBG pass-through funds that local jurisdictions can direct toward ADU-adjacent rehab, but there is no state-level ADU-dedicated line item. Federally available products (FHA 203(k), Fannie Mae HomeReady and HomeStyle Renovation, Freddie Mac CHOICERenovation) remain the primary ADU financing path for Virginia homeowners.
State housing programs
Virginia does not run a state-level pre-approved-ADU-plan catalog, statewide impact-fee-waiver statute for ADUs, or streamlined-review mandate. State-level programs that touch ADU-adjacent policy are coordinated primarily through the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) and Virginia Housing, and act by funding or assisting local jurisdictions rather than by preemption. Local ADU activity — Arlington County's Accessory Dwellings program (detached ADUs permitted since 2008, liberalized 2020), Alexandria's accessory-dwelling ordinance, Fairfax County's accessory-living-unit program, and Charlottesville's 2021 zoning-code changes — is authorized under the localities' Va. Code § 15.2-2280 zoning authority, not by state mandate.
- DHCD Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program — Federal CDBG funds administered by DHCD to eligible non-entitlement Virginia localities for community-revitalization, housing-rehab, and infrastructure projects. Not ADU-specific. Participating localities can direct CDBG funds toward housing-rehab projects where local policy supports ADUs.
- DHCD HOME Investment Partnerships Program — Federal HOME funds administered by DHCD to Virginia participating jurisdictions and non-profits for affordable-housing acquisition, rehab, and new construction. Not ADU-specific; can be directed to ADU-adjacent rehab at local discretion.
- Virginia Housing Commission — Permanent advisory commission of the General Assembly that studies housing-policy questions and recommends legislation. Has periodically studied ADU preemption and missing-middle housing without recommending statewide enactment as of 2026-04-21.
- Local ADU ordinances under Va. Code § 15.2-2280 authority — Not a state program — listed here because Virginia ADU policy is executed entirely at the locality level under the § 15.2-2280 zoning grant. A homeowner seeking to build an ADU consults the zoning ordinance of the specific county, city, or town where the parcel is located.
Federal (United States) — ADU-relevant rules and programs
Federal ADU law
The United States has no federal statute that directly regulates accessory dwelling unit entitlement or design. Land-use authority over ADUs resides with states and local governments under the traditional police power. Federal engagement is limited to financing (Fannie/Freddie/FHA/VA/USDA), flood insurance (FEMA/NFIP), and discretionary housing programs (HUD), which are recorded in sibling sections of this file.
Federal financing programs
Federal housing-finance agencies and GSEs set nationwide underwriting rules that govern whether an ADU can be financed, appraised, and counted toward mortgage qualifying income. The relevant actors are Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA (HUD), VA, and USDA Rural Development.
Federal tax credits
There is no ADU-specific federal tax credit. ADUs may incidentally qualify for existing federal energy-efficiency and clean-energy tax credits when the ADU construction includes qualifying measures.
Federal housing programs
HUD administers several discretionary programs that can fund ADU-related activity at the grantee's election, but none is an ADU-specific program.